SCIENTIFIC METHODOLOGICAL FOUNDATIONS OF GEOPOLITICAL RESEARCH

Authors

  • Kojageldiyev Abatbay Uzaqbayevich

Keywords:

Keywords: Geopolitical research, scientific methodology, power, geography, international relations, hypothesis formulation, data collection, data analysis, sampling techniques, ethical considerations, theory testing, theory building, context, comparative analysis, longitudinal studies, mixed-methods research, policy implications, collaboration, reflexivity, case studies, geospatial analysis, network analysis, counterfactual analysis, meta-analysis, long-term trend analysis.

Abstract

Abstract: This article explores the scientific methodological foundations of geopolitical research, which involves the study of power, geography, and international relations. It provides an overview of key principles and approaches that guide the conduct of rigorous and systematic geopolitical research. The article discusses concepts such as hypothesis formulation, data collection and analysis, sampling techniques, ethical considerations, and the importance of theory testing and theory building. It also emphasizes the interdisciplinary nature of geopolitical research and the significance of context, comparative analysis, and longitudinal studies. Additionally, the article highlights the relevance of mixed-methods research, policy implications, collaboration, reflexivity, and the use of case studies, geospatial analysis, network analysis, counterfactual analysis, meta-analysis, and long-term trend analysis. By understanding and applying these scientific methodological foundations, researchers can enhance their understanding of geopolitical dynamics and contribute to informed decision-making and policy development.

References

Agnew, J. (2011). Globalization and Sovereignty. Rowman & Littlefield.

Checkel, J. T. (2005). International Institutions and Socialization in Europe. Cambridge University Press.

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Sage Publications.

Deudney, D., & Ikenberry, G. J. (2018). The Oxford Handbook of International Relations. Oxford University Press.

George, A. L., & Bennett, A. (2005). Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. MIT Press.

Gill, P., Stewart, K., Treasure, E., & Chadwick, B. (2008). Methods of Data Collection in Qualitative Research: Interviews and Focus Groups. British Dental Journal, 204(6), 291-295.

Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology. Sage Publications.

Lazer, D., Pentland, A. S., Adamic, L., Aral, S., Barabasi, A. L., Brewer, D., ... & Van Alstyne, M. (2009). Computational Social Science. Science, 323(5915), 721-723.

Mahoney, J., & Goertz, G. (Eds.). (2006). A Tale of Two Cultures: Qualitative and Quantitative Research in the Social Sciences. Princeton University Press.

Scharpf, F. W. (1997). Games Real Actors Play: Actor-Centered Institutionalism in Policy Research. Westview Press.

Seawright, J., & Gerring, J. (Eds.). (2008). Case Selection for Case-Study Analysis: Qualitative and Quantitative Techniques. Cambridge University Press.

Sprinz, D. F., & Wolinsky-Nahmias, Y. (Eds.). (2004). Models, Numbers, and Cases: Methods for Studying International Relations. University of Michigan Press.

Van Evera, S. (1997). Guide to Methods for Students of Political Science. Cornell University Press.

Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. Cambridge University Press.

Published

2024-03-17

How to Cite

Kojageldiyev Abatbay Uzaqbayevich. (2024). SCIENTIFIC METHODOLOGICAL FOUNDATIONS OF GEOPOLITICAL RESEARCH. ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ НАУКА И ИННОВАЦИОННЫЕ ИДЕИ В МИРЕ, 41(3), 108–111. Retrieved from https://newjournal.org/01/article/view/12147