ENHANCING CRITICAL THINKING SKILLS IN EDUCATION: STRATEGIES, CHALLENGES AND IMPLICATIONS

Authors

  • Temirova Sabohat Bakhrullayevna
  • Shohida Kasimova

Keywords:

Keywords: Critical thinking, education, pedagogy, strategies, challenges, implications, cognitive skills, problem-solving

Abstract

Annotation:  This thesis explores the multifaceted realm of enhancing critical thinking skills in education, investigating various strategies, the challenges encountered, and the broader implications for learners and society. Beginning with a comprehensive definition of critical thinking, it traces its importance in education and beyond. The historical development of critical thinking pedagogy is examined, leading to an exploration of contemporary challenges and effective strategies for fostering critical thinking skills in educational settings.

References

Paul, R., & Elder, L. (2008). Critical Thinking: The Nature of Critical and Creative Thought. Journal of Developmental Education, 32, 34-35. www.jstor.org.

Socrates. (n.d.). In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/socrates/.

UNESCO. (2017). Education for Sustainable Development Goals: Learning Objectives. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000247444.

Willingham, D. T. (2007). Critical Thinking: Why Is It So Hard to Teach?. American Educator, 11, 8-19. www.aft.org/ae/summer2007/willingham.

Facione, P. A. (1990). Critical Thinking: A Statement of Expert Consensus for Purposes of Educational Assessment and Instruction. Research findings and recommendations. www.eric.ed.gov.

Halpern, D. F. (1998). Teaching Critical Thinking for Transfer Across Domains: Dispositions, Skills, Structure Training, and Metacognitive Monitoring. American Psychologist, 53, 449-455. www.apa.org/pubs/journals/amp/

Published

2024-03-19

How to Cite

Temirova Sabohat Bakhrullayevna, & Shohida Kasimova. (2024). ENHANCING CRITICAL THINKING SKILLS IN EDUCATION: STRATEGIES, CHALLENGES AND IMPLICATIONS. ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ НАУКА И ИННОВАЦИОННЫЕ ИДЕИ В МИРЕ, 41(3), 35–37. Retrieved from https://newjournal.org/01/article/view/12295