CROSS-CULTURE ADAPTATION
Keywords:
Keywords: cross-cultural experiments; methodological equivalence; back translation; sampling; response bias; unpackaging; cultural priming; situation sampling.Abstract
Cross-cultural experimental research is a methodological tool to reveal differences between cultures and identify cause-and-effect relationships. Any consideration of research designs starts with the development of cultural competence. When constructing an experiment, cultures of interest have to be considered and independent and dependent variables have to be adapted to ensure methodological equivalence. Before collecting data, sampling strategies and ethical considerations have to be taken into account. When interpreting cross-cultural findings, the researcher has to adjust for culture-specific response biases and consider adequate statistical measures. To help identify underlying cultural variables, specific methods like unpackaging, cultural priming, or situation sampling can be applied. Optimally, cross- cultural differences are captured in multiple studies using divergent methods
References
Matsumoto, D., & Yoo, S. H. (2006). Toward a new generation of cross-cultural research.Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1, 234-250. doi: 10.1111/j.1745- 6916.2006.00014.x
Bachman, J. G., & O’Malley, P. M. (1984). Black-white differences in self-esteem: Are they affected by response styles?. American Journal of Sociology, 624-639. doi: 10.1086/228120
Chen, C., Lee, S. Y., & Stevenson, H. W. (1995). Response style and cross-cultural comparisons of rating scales among East Asian and North American students. Psychological Science, 170-175. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1995.tb00327.x
Sussman, N. M., & Rosenfeld, H. M. (1982). Influence of culture, language, and sex on conversational distance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 66-74. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.42.1.66
Trafimow, D., Triandis, H. C., & Goto, S. G. (1991). Some tests of the distinction between the private self and the collective self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 649-655. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.60.5.649