TEXT AS DATA METHODS FOR EDUCATION RESEARCH
Keywords:
Key words: technique; text; untapped data; social media; scale;Abstract
Recent advances in computational linguistics and the social sciences have created new opportunities for the education research community to analyze relevant large-scale text data. However, the take-up of these advances in education research is still nascent. In this paper, we review the recent automated text methods relevant to educational processes and determinants
References
Anderson, R. (2018). Beyond copy room collaboration: A case study of online informal teacher professional learning. In Rethinking Learning in the Digital Age: Making the Learning Sciences Count, 13th International Conference of the Learning Sciences (ICLS) (Vol. 3, pp. 1511–1512). London, UK: International Society of the Learning Sciences.
Baker, R., Dee, T., Evans, B., & John, J. (2018). Bias in Online Classes: Evidence from a Field Experiment (CEPA Working Paper No. 18–03). Retrieved from http://cepa.stanford.edu/wp18-03
Baker, S. R., Bloom, N., & Davis, S. J. (2016). Measuring Economic Policy Uncertainty. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 131(4), 1593–1636.
Beattie, G., Laliberté, J. W. P., & Oreopoulos, P. (2018). Thrivers and divers: Using non-academic measures to predict college success and failure. Economics of Education Review, 62(January 2017), 170–182.
Bertrand, M., & Mullainathan, S. (2004). Are Emily and Greg More Employable Than Lakisha and Jamal? A Field Experiment on Labor Market Discrimination. American Economic Review, 94(4), 991–1013.
Bettinger, E., Liu, J., & Loeb, S. (2016). Connections Matter: How Interactive Peers Affect Students in Online College Courses. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam
Blei, D. M., Ng, A. Y., & Jordan, M. I. (2003). Latent Dirichlet Allocation. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 3, 993–1022.
Bohren, J. A., Imas, A., & Rosenberg, M. (2017). The Dynamics of Discrimination: Theory and Evidence
