RESHAPING BILATERAL INVESTMENT TREATIES AS INTEGRATIVE TOOLS FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT: THE KENYAN EXPERIENCE

Authors

  • Abduraxmonova Noila Quvondiq qizi

Keywords:

Key words: Sustainable Development, Foreign Investments, public benefit.

Abstract

Sustainable development is a fundamental principle of International Law. It is closely related to and should be a core objective of any international treaty seeking to address developmental concerns. Curiously, however, a critical review of legal literature reveals seemingly little attention given to the actual assessment of ‘how and to what extent’ existing Bilateral Investment Treaties (BITs) have integrated sustainable developmental concerns. This is particularly in relation to BITs involving developing countries in Africa such as Kenya. Accordingly, taking Kenya as an illustrative case, this study makes a critical assessment of the BITs concluded between Kenya, the Netherlands, Britain, and Germany; with a view to establishing how and to what extent the said BITs have integrated sustainable development. The study argues that most (if not all) BITs remain silent on sustainable development. Further, the methods of integrating sustainable development are premised on placing host state obligations to protect investors and their investments. In doing so, the implied assumption is that protection will attract foreign investment necessary for financing sustainable development. Nevertheless, as the paper highlights, difficulties have arisen in measuring how revenue generated from foreign investment has contributed to the sustainable development due to the unpredictable patterns of revenue inflow from foreign. This in turn creates difficulties in using the said revenue when planning for long-term sustainable yields in development. Accordingly, the paper urges a collectively rethinking of the usage of BITs as a tool for sustainable development involving, states taking deliberate steps to recast BITs to ensure that the process of negotiation of BITs, the structure that emanates from the negotiation and the implementation of the BITs; explicitly seek to integrate sustainable development. This necessarily involves placing obligations on both state and non-state actors in realizing sustainable development.

References

Agenda 21: Programme of Action for Sustainable Development, Report of the UNCED 1992, vol. U.N. GAOR, 46th Sess.

Agreement between the Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and the Government of the Republic of Kenya Available online at http://www.unctadxi.org/templates/DocSearch____779.aspx

Agreement for Economic Co-operation between the Government of the Kingdom of the Netherlands and the Government of the Republic of Kenya Available online at http://www.unctadxi.org/templates/DocSearch____779.aspx

Dubava, I. (2010). Reconciling International Investment Law and Sustainable Development: Necessity or Luxury? Society of International Economic Law & University of Missouri Kansas City School of law. Study presented at the Second Biennial Conference held 8-10 July 2010 at the University of Barcelona.

Fabienne, F, & Maher, M. (2O11).Foreign Direct Investment and Sustainable Development. OECD Journal Financial Market Trends. Paris: OECD

Howley, J. (2009). The Gabcikovo-Nagymaros Case: The Influence of the International Court of Justice on the Law of Sustainable Development. Queensland Law Student Review Volume 2 number 1.

International Institute for Sustainable Development.(2012). Investment Treaties and Why they matter for Sustainable Development: Questions and Answers. Canada: International Institute for Sustainable Development. International Law Association. (2004). First Report of the International Law Committee on International Law on Sustainable Development.

Knottnerus, R & Roos van Os. (2011). Dutch Bilateral Investment Treaties: A gateway to Treaty Shopping for Investment protection by multinational companies. Amsterdam: Stitching Onderzoek Multinationale Ondernemingen. See also Amarasinha op cit n 49

Leo, B. (2010). Where are the BITs? How US Bilateral Investment Treaties with Africa Can Promote Development. United States: Centre for Global Development

Markert, L. (2011). The Crucial Question of Future Investment Treaties: Balance Investors’ Rights and Regulatory Interests of the Host State. In Brungenberg, M et al. (Eds). International Investment Law and EU Law. Berlin: Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

Pritchard, R. (1996). Economic Development, Foreign Investment and the Law: Issues of Private Sector Involvement, Foreign Investment, and Rule of Law in a new Era. The Hague London and Boston: Kluwer Law International and International Bar Association.

Puvimanasinghe, S. (2007). Towards A Jurisprudence of Sustainable Development in South Asia: Litigation in the Public Interest. Leiden: Koninklijke Brill NV

Rio Declaration on Environment and Development 1992

Sauvant, K. (2012). The times they are a-changin’-again-in the relationships between governments and multinational enterprises: From control, to liberalization to rebalancing. Canada: Vale Columbia Center on Sustainable International Investment.

Segger, C, M., Gehring, M, W., & Newcombe, A. (Eds.). (2011). Sustainable Development in World Investment Law. The Netherlands: Kluwer Law International

The Treaty between the Federal Republic of Germany and the Republic of Kenya Available online at http://www.unctadxi.org/templates/DocSearch____779.aspx

UNCTAD. (2008). International Investment Rule-making: Stocktaking, challenges and the way forward. Series on International Investment Policies for development. United Nations New York and Geneva.

United Nations Economic and Social Council. (2009). Human rights, trade and investment: Report of the High Commissioner for Human Rights. United Nations: New York

World Bank Annual publication Word Development Report 2003.

Published

2024-06-13

How to Cite

Abduraxmonova Noila Quvondiq qizi. (2024). RESHAPING BILATERAL INVESTMENT TREATIES AS INTEGRATIVE TOOLS FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT: THE KENYAN EXPERIENCE. Journal of New Century Innovations, 54(6), 128–138. Retrieved from https://newjournal.org/new/article/view/14936